[llvm-bugs] [Bug 36802] New: Install LLVMgold.so into {libdir}/bfd-plugins by default

via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Mon Mar 19 10:19:43 PDT 2018


https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36802

            Bug ID: 36802
           Summary: Install LLVMgold.so into {libdir}/bfd-plugins by
                    default
           Product: tools
           Version: trunk
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Windows NT
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P
         Component: lto
          Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: dilyan.palauzov at aegee.org
                CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org

As of 6.0, cmake compiles LLVMgold.so and puts it into {libdir}.

Doing "./configure && make install" for binutils, teaches ranlib, ar and nm to
scan by default {libdir}/bfd-plugins alphabetically and the first plugin, that
claims the object is used.

For the LTO primetime to arise, doing everywhere just "./configure && make
install" or the alternative cmake process, shall provide reasonable defaults. 
In the concrete case, ar/nm/ranlib by default search in
/usr/local/lib/bfd-plugins , so llvm's `make install` shall put there
LLVMgold.so, unless asked to do something else.

Currently users detect in autoconf if they will do LTO, then switch
ar/nm/ranlib to gcc-ar/gcc-nm/gcc-ranlib in order to avoid dealing with the
--plugin and because they are unaware of the bfd-plugin directory.  This is
unacceptable.  This of course does not work, if gcc is not installed on the
system, but ar/ranlib/nm would work when the plugins are properly installed.

For GCC I filled the same request at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84934.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20180319/d03b2bd9/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list