[llvm-bugs] [Bug 36563] New: Unlike GNU ld, some options do not accept --long-option=value

[via llvm-bugs]

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36563

            Bug ID: 36563
           Summary: Unlike GNU ld, some options do not accept
                    --long-option=value
           Product: lld
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: FreeBSD
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P
         Component: ELF
          Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: emaste at freebsd.org
                CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org

In r326459 I updated the manpage to prefer --long-option=value in
documentation, as GNU ld does. There are a couple of options in lld that do not
follow this scheme - at least:

Long options also supported by bfd/gold, where lld does not accept the = form:

--auxiliary value
--dynamic-linker value
--oformat format
--section-start address

lld-specific long options where = is not accepted:

--lto-O opt-level
--opt-remarks-filename file
--symbol-ordering-file file
--thinlto-cache-policy file

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20180302/c3b841a1/attachment.html>