[llvm-bugs] [Bug 37808] New: llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp:366: void llvm::MemorySSAUpdater::fixupDefs(const llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MemoryAccess*>&): Assertion `MSSA->dominates(NewDef, FirstDef) && "Should have dominated the new access"' failed.
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 14 12:14:34 PDT 2018
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37808
Bug ID: 37808
Summary: llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp:366: void
llvm::MemorySSAUpdater::fixupDefs(const
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MemoryAccess*>&):
Assertion `MSSA->dominates(NewDef, FirstDef) &&
"Should have dominated the new access"' failed.
Product: tools
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: opt
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: balarishi.bhogadi at amd.com
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Created attachment 20430
--> https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?id=20430&action=edit
Error message
Bug Description:
Facing the below assertion failure with the latest version:
--
opt:
/home/amd/JENKINS/workspace/CPUPC_Mirror_Branch/llvm/lib/Analysis/MemorySSAUpdater.cpp:366:
void llvm::MemorySSAUpdater::fixupDefs(const
llvm::SmallVectorImpl<llvm::MemoryAccess*>&): Assertion
`MSSA->dominates(NewDef, FirstDef) && "Should have dominated the new access"'
failed.
Stack dump:
--
This issue is faced with the fix given for Bug 36484.
Attached: input IR file and error message file
=========
Steps to reproduce:
- Download the attached file
- Extract the file using command "tar -xvf gvnhoist_issue_input.o.tar.xz"
- Execute the below with the recent version of llvm: opt -S -gvn-hoist -o
gvnhoist_issue_output.o gvnhoist_issue_input.o
=========
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20180614/77ab0be5/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list