[llvm-bugs] [Bug 38257] operator& definition causes unexplained error passing pointer-to-member to template parameter

via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jul 21 22:22:01 PDT 2018


Richard Smith <richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk

--- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk> ---
We're performing ADL for the & in &Y::field, which triggers instantiation of
the associated classes (including 'Foo<void>'). But we shouldn't be, because
Y::field is resolved to a non-static class member, so user-declared 'operator&'
functions are not relevant.

Fixed in r337653.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20180722/ec51872a/attachment.html>

More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list