[llvm-bugs] [Bug 36484] New: Assertion failure with GVNHoist: Assertion `MSSA->dominates(NewDef, FirstDef) && "Should have dominated the new access"' failed.
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Thu Feb 22 18:44:22 PST 2018
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36484
Bug ID: 36484
Summary: Assertion failure with GVNHoist: Assertion
`MSSA->dominates(NewDef, FirstDef) && "Should have
dominated the new access"' failed.
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: Scalar Optimizations
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: efriedma at codeaurora.org
CC: dberlin at dberlin.org, hiraditya at msn.com,
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Testcase (crashes with "opt -gvn-hoist"):
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64"
define void @f(i8* %p) {
entry:
switch i4 undef, label %if.then30 [
i4 4, label %if.end
i4 0, label %if.end
]
if.end:
br label %if.end19
if.end19:
br i1 undef, label %e, label %e.thread
e.thread:
store i8 0, i8* %p, align 4
br label %if.then30
if.then30:
call void @g()
unreachable
e:
store i8 0, i8* %p, align 4
unreachable
}
declare void @g()
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The issue is related to the MemoryPhi in the block if.then30.
MemorySSAUpdater::moveTo erases the store in the block e.thread, then erases
the MemoryPHI in if.then30 because it's trivial (temporarily), then tries to
insert a def in if.end19. fixupDefs then asserts that if.end19 dominates
if.then30, which is not true.
Not sure what the right fix is here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20180223/bc28f227/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list