[llvm-bugs] [Bug 40024] New: Assertion on instantiating function definition from template type function
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 14 08:16:07 PST 2018
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40024
Bug ID: 40024
Summary: Assertion on instantiating function definition from
template type function
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++'17
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: christian.bruel at st.com
CC: blitzrakete at gmail.com, erik.pilkington at gmail.com,
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org, richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
Created attachment 21224
--> https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?id=21224&action=edit
reproduce -stdc++17
The attached code compiled with
clang++ -std=c++17 bug.C
asserts with
lib/Sema/SemaTemplate.cpp:6814: clang::ExprResult
clang::Sema::BuildExpressionFromDeclTemplateArgument(const
clang::TemplateArgument&, clang::QualType, clang::SourceLocation): Assertion
`!RefExpr.isInvalid() && Context.hasSameType(((Expr*)
RefExpr.get())->getType(), ParamType.getUnqualifiedType())' failed.
I'm not sure it is valid c++17. it compiles fine with c++11 and returns the
following error with g++:
error: 'int (S::*)(){((int (S::*)())S::f<110>), 0}' is not a valid template
argument for type 'int (S::*)()'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20181214/78fda084/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list