[llvm-bugs] [Bug 35069] New: Range does not handle `add` and `ugt` comparison well
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Tue Oct 24 21:18:41 PDT 2017
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35069
Bug ID: 35069
Summary: Range does not handle `add` and `ugt` comparison well
Product: libraries
Version: 5.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: Scalar Optimizations
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: yyc1992 at gmail.com
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Reproduced with following IR.
```
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
define void @f(i64*) {
%2 = load i64, i64* %0, align 8, !range !0
%3 = add i64 %2, -1
%4 = icmp ugt i64 %3, 1000
br i1 %4, label %L1, label %L2
L1:
tail call void @g()
unreachable
L2:
ret void
}
declare void @g()
!0 = !{i64 2, i64 100}
```
I believe that the function should be optmized to `ret void` since the `icmp`
should always be `false` for the specified range. However, `opt` with
`-instcombine`, `-instsimplify` or just `-O3` does nothing to the `icmp` or the
branch.
Removing the `add` (and make `icmp` take the load value directly) works as
expected as well as replacing the `ugt` with `sgt` even though it shouldn't
make a difference in the value range....
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20171025/7e65ca58/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list