[llvm-bugs] [Bug 35363] New: Incorrect order of evaluation for || somehow involving ! of _Bool
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 20 06:28:02 PST 2017
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35363
Bug ID: 35363
Summary: Incorrect order of evaluation for || somehow involving
! of _Bool
Product: clang
Version: 5.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: LLVM Codegen
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: jseward at acm.org
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Incorrect order of evaluation for || somehow involving ! of _Bool
For the following input (in C)
void ff(void);
void gg(void);
_Bool hh(int*);
void test()
{
int a;
_Bool q = hh(&a);
if (!q || (a == 42))
ff();
else
gg();
}
"clang version 5.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_500/final) (llvm/tags/RELEASE_500/final
312553)" on x86_64-Linux, at -O and above, produces code that firsts tests
|a == 42| and only then |!q|:
test: # @test
.cfi_startproc
# BB#0:
pushq %rax
.Lcfi0:
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
leaq 4(%rsp), %rdi
callq hh
cmpl $42, 4(%rsp)
je .LBB0_2
# BB#1:
testb %al, %al
je .LBB0_2
# BB#3:
callq gg
popq %rax
retq
.LBB0_2:
callq ff
popq %rax
retq
I don't see how it can justify comparing |a==42| before looking at the
return value from hh.
I notice also that it produces the "expected" order of tests (testb, then
cmpl) for either of the following changes:
* using |unsigned char| or |int| or |long| instead of |_Bool|
* changing the first term from |!q| to simply |q|
It's as if the compiler believes that ! of _Bool is undefined behavior in
C, so it can do what it likes. But I can't imagine why it would believe
that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20171120/da2858b4/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list