[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33599] New: BPF target: relocation records generated for calculations on constants
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 26 13:00:13 PDT 2017
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33599
Bug ID: 33599
Summary: BPF target: relocation records generated for
calculations on constants
Product: new-bugs
Version: 3.8
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: new bugs
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: daniel at iogearbox.net
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
cilium bug id: https://github.com/cilium/cilium/issues/1033
llc --version
llc: /lib64/libtinfo.so.5: no version information available (required by llc)
LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
LLVM version 3.8.1
Optimized build.
Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Host CPU: skylake
Registered Targets:
[...]
bpf - BPF (host endian)
bpfeb - BPF (big endian)
bpfel - BPF (little endian)
[...]
No issue with following code:
static inline struct endpoint_info *__inline__ lookup_ip4_endpoint(struct iphdr
*ip4)
{
struct endpoint_key key = { };
key.ip4 = bpf_ntohl(42);
return map_lookup_elem(&cilium_lxc, &key);
}
Issue with that one:
static inline struct endpoint_info *__inline__ lookup_ip4_endpoint(struct iphdr
*ip4)
{
struct endpoint_key key = {
.ip4 = bpf_ntohl(42);
};
return map_lookup_elem(&cilium_lxc, &key);
}
bpf_ntohl() implementation in both cases is at:
https://github.com/cilium/cilium/blob/master/bpf/lib/utils.h
LLVM generates an invalid reloc entry from BPF backend for the problematic
lookup_ip4_endpoint(), but it (rightfully) doesn't generate an entry for the
other one.
More details from asm:
[...]
# BB#154:
std -136(r10), r5
ld_64 r1, <MCOperand Expr:(.Llookup_ip4_endpoint.key)>
ldw r2, 0(r1)
ldw r1, 4(r1)
slli r1, 32
or r1, r2
std -56(r10), r1
std -64(r10), r1
mov r2, r10
addi r2, -64
ld_64 r1, <MCOperand Expr:(cilium_lxc)>
call 1
jeqi r0, 0 goto LBB5_305
[...]
.section .rodata.cst16,"aM", at progbits,16
.align 4 # @lookup_ip4_endpoint.key
.Llookup_ip4_endpoint.key:
.long 704643072 # 0x2a000000
.zero 12
I would also have though that given this is all ops based on constants, that
LLVM optimizes all of this away and just performs the load of the final
constant.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20170626/69743176/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list