[llvm-bugs] [Bug 33550] New: Clang rejects deleted defaulted noexcept default constructor
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 21 14:18:15 PDT 2017
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33550
Bug ID: 33550
Summary: Clang rejects deleted defaulted noexcept default
constructor
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: billy.oneal at gmail.com
CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Consider the following:
template<class _Ty>
struct atomic {
constexpr atomic(_Ty _Val) throw() // TRANSITION, VSO#174686
: _My_val(_Val)
{ // construct from _Val, initialization is not an atomic
operation
}
atomic() _NOEXCEPT = default;
atomic(const atomic&) = delete;
atomic& operator=(const atomic&) = delete;
atomic& operator=(const atomic&) volatile = delete;
_Ty _My_val;
};
struct non_default_ctor_able {
non_default_ctor_able() = delete;
explicit non_default_ctor_able(int) {}
non_default_ctor_able(const non_default_ctor_able&) = default;
non_default_ctor_able& operator=(const non_default_ctor_able&) = default;
~non_default_ctor_able() = default;
};
int main() {
atomic<non_default_ctor_able> atm{non_default_ctor_able{42}};
(void)atm;
};
C1XX, EDG, and GCC are all happy with this. Clang rejects (
https://wandbox.org/permlink/b40YJn7QwRprgdTp ) , saying:
prog.cc:9:2: error: exception specification of explicitly defaulted default
constructor does not match the calculated one
atomic() noexcept = default;
^
prog.cc:26:35: note: in instantiation of template class
'atomic<non_default_ctor_able>' requested here
atomic<non_default_ctor_able> atm{non_default_ctor_able{42}};
^
1 error generated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20170621/4c794683/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list