[llvm-bugs] [Bug 32802] New: [BranchFolding] Investigate reducing the default value of tail-merge-size
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 26 07:09:14 PDT 2017
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32802
Bug ID: 32802
Summary: [BranchFolding] Investigate reducing the default value
of tail-merge-size
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: Transformation Utilities
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: llvm-dev at redking.me.uk
CC: andrew.v.tischenko at gmail.com, davide at freebsd.org,
filcab at gmail.com, jlpaquet at uvic.ca,
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org, matze at braunis.de
llvm\lib\CodeGen\BranchFolding.cpp:
// Heuristic for tail merging (and, inversely, tail duplication).
// TODO: This should be replaced with a target query.
static cl::opt<unsigned>
TailMergeSize("tail-merge-size",
cl::desc("Min number of instructions to consider tail merging"),
cl::init(3), cl::Hidden);
Currently the tail-merge-size for duplicate BB tail merging is set to a default
value of 3 instructions, which prevents us from merging all the BBs that we
could otherwise (Bug #27136 and D30572). Additionally there appears to be no
testing of this feature at all.
Is the value purely for compile time reasons or does it have to have a value
that must correctly interact with tail-dup-placement-threshold?
Does the TODO comment suggesting making it target specific make sense?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20170426/f6766042/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list