[llvm-bugs] [Bug 30340] New: Poor diagnostics when an explicitly defaulted move assignment operator can't be generated
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Fri Sep 9 13:32:08 PDT 2016
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30340
Bug ID: 30340
Summary: Poor diagnostics when an explicitly defaulted move
assignment operator can't be generated
Product: clang
Version: 3.9
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: john.firebaugh at gmail.com
CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Classification: Unclassified
Test case:
#include <utility>
struct Immovable {
Immovable& operator=(Immovable&&) = delete;
};
struct Foo {
Foo();
Foo& operator=(Foo&&) = default;
Immovable immovable;
};
int main() {
Foo foo1;
Foo foo2;
foo1 = std::move(foo2);
}
Clang output (https://godbolt.org/g/yyhU39):
16 : error: object of type 'Foo' cannot be assigned because its copy assignment
operator is implicitly deleted
foo1 = std::move(foo2);
^
9 : note: copy assignment operator is implicitly deleted because 'Foo' has a
user-declared move assignment operator
Foo& operator=(Foo&&) = default;
This error message gives no hint as to the actual issue, the fact that the
explicitly defaulted move assignment operator for Foo could not be generated.
Compare GCC's output (https://godbolt.org/g/IVx9xU):
16 : error: use of deleted function 'Foo& Foo::operator=(Foo&&)'
foo1 = std::move(foo2);
^
9 : note: 'Foo& Foo::operator=(Foo&&)' is implicitly deleted because the
default definition would be ill-formed:
Foo& operator=(Foo&&) = default;
^~~~~~~~
9 : error: use of deleted function 'Immovable&
Immovable::operator=(Immovable&&)'
4 : note: declared here
Immovable& operator=(Immovable&&) = delete;
^~~~~~~~
Compilation failed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20160909/33904e82/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list