[llvm-bugs] [Bug 26883] New: Using cmpxchg[8|16]b produces incorrect code with dynamically allocated stack
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 8 12:07:39 PST 2016
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26883
Bug ID: 26883
Summary: Using cmpxchg[8|16]b produces incorrect code with
dynamically allocated stack
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: Backend: X86
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: qcolombet at apple.com
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Classification: Unclassified
Created attachment 16011
--> https://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=16011&action=edit
Reproducer
cmpxchg[8|16]b uses RBX as one of its argument.
In other words, using this instruction clobbers RBX as it defined to hold one
the input.
When the backend uses dynamically allocated stack, RBX is used as a reserved
register for the base pointer.
Reserved registers have special semantic that only the target understands and
enforces, because of that, the register allocator don’t use them, but also,
don’t try to make sure they are used properly (remember it does not know how
they are supposed to be used).
Therefore, when RBX is used as a reserved register but defined by something
that is not compatible with that use, the register allocator will not fix the
surrounding code to make sure it gets saved and restored properly around the
broken code. This is the responsibility of the target to do the right thing
with its reserved register.
The attached bitcode file demonstrates such bad code generation.
To reproduce:
llc -mattr=+cx16 -x86-use-base-pointer=true -stackrealign -stack-alignment=32
-o - ../test/CodeGen/X86/base-pointer-and-cmpxchg.ll
Result:
movq %rdx, %rbx ; <— RBX gets defined for the instruction cmpxchg16b
movq %rsp, %rax
movq %rax, 32(%rbx) ; <— as a result we spill in random place.
[…]
movq 40(%rbx), %rax ; <— and reload garbage
[...]
lock cmpxchg16b (%rsi)
I have tried to fix that in r262759 by falling back to the lib call
__sync_val_compare_and_swap when we need RBX as base pointer. Turns out this
function is not available in compiler-rt unlike what I thought.
We may want to add it for x86.
Anyhow, filing this to keep track of the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20160308/bfff591e/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list