[llvm-bugs] [Bug 28287] New: Move dragonegg to historical status (or remove)

via llvm-bugs llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Thu Jun 23 23:18:11 PDT 2016


https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28287

            Bug ID: 28287
           Summary: Move dragonegg to historical status (or remove)
           Product: Website
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P
         Component: General Website
          Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: danielgb at au1.ibm.com
                CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
    Classification: Unclassified

http://dragonegg.llvm.org/ exists - its not visible indicate that its not
maintained.

The current bug status is:

https://llvm.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?list_id=100175&product=dragonegg&query_format=advanced&order=changeddate%20DESC%2Cbug_status%2Cpriority%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_id&query_based_on=

The top of the svn log is:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
r222350 | chapuni | 2014-11-19 23:28:08 +1100 (Wed, 19 Nov 2014) | 1 line

Update for LLVM API change to make Small(Ptr)Set::insert return pair<iterator,
bool> as per the C++ standard's associative container concept.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r221243 | chapuni | 2014-11-04 17:22:38 +1100 (Tue, 04 Nov 2014) | 1 line

dragonegg/Internals.h: Use LLVM_END_WITH_NULL.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r220678 | chapuni | 2014-10-27 23:37:26 +1100 (Mon, 27 Oct 2014) | 1 line

Prune CRLF.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r220409 | rafael | 2014-10-23 06:35:27 +1100 (Thu, 23 Oct 2014) | 1 line

Drop TODO_ggc_collect. I was removed from newer gcc's.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r220139 | chandlerc | 2014-10-18 18:43:30 +1100 (Sat, 18 Oct 2014) | 10 lines


As you can see, nothing has happened for quite a while.



Most #ifdef in the code rely on the GCC_MINOR version without regard to the
GCC_MAJOR so its incredibly fragile as to which gcc version it relates to.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20160624/5e7bf37e/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list