[llvm-bugs] [Bug 26127] New: miscompilation with -O wrong branch taken
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 13 03:13:53 PST 2016
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26127
Bug ID: 26127
Summary: miscompilation with -O wrong branch taken
Product: clang
Version: 3.7
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: release blocker
Priority: P
Component: C++
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: Vasilis.Vlachoudis at cern.ch
CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Classification: Unclassified
In my program that compiles and runs with gcc with clang++ 3.7 on Fedora 23 it
fails on the following fraction of the code.
if (Abs(g) < Abs(f)) {
c1 = 0.0;
c4 = -c / (2.0*f);
} else {
c1 = -c / (2.0*g);
c4 = 0.0;
}
with g=-0.5, f=0.0 (doubles)
however it selects the upper branch and it makes a division by zero when
evaluating the c4.
When I switch off optimization it runs with no problem.
When I add a
printf("g=%g f=%g\n",g,f);
it also runs with no problem.
The Abs() is declared as
/* --- Abs --- */
template <class T>
inline T Abs(const T& a) {
return (a<0) ? -a : a;
}
#include <math.h>
// Partial specializations
template <>
inline double Abs(const double& a) {
return fabs(a);
}
template <>
inline float Abs(const float& a) {
return fabsf(a);
}
I've tried to extract only the portion of the code that crashes, but all my
attempts failed. I can only reproduce it with the whole code.
In case it is necessary I can provide you the svn to download the code and a
test example.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20160113/055298f2/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list