[llvm-bugs] [Bug 31399] New: [CodeGen] suboptimal code for ffs()
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Thu Dec 15 15:25:40 PST 2016
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31399
Bug ID: 31399
Summary: [CodeGen] suboptimal code for ffs()
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: Common Code Generator Code
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: davide at freebsd.org
CC: filcab at gmail.com, llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org,
llvm-dev at redking.me.uk, simon.f.whittaker at gmail.com
Classification: Unclassified
Given
#include <strings.h>
int f(int x) {
return ffs(x) + 1;
}
compiled with -O3, clang 3.9.0 generates
f(int): # @f(int)
bsfl %edi, %ecx
addl $2, %ecx
testl %edi, %edi
movl $1, %eax
cmovnel %ecx, %eax
retq
while gcc 6.2 generates:
f(int):
bsf eax, edi
mov edx, -1
cmove eax, edx
add eax, 2
ret
We could save a test instruction. I don't think it matters a lot in practice,
but maybe a fun exercise if somebody wants to take a look (cc:ing Simon W. who
was looking for small codegen bugs to fix).
(Note that we lower ffs() to (x != 0) ? llvm.cttz(x) + 1 : 0 in
SimplifyLibCalls.cpp)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20161215/ba2bc916/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list