[llvm-bugs] [Bug 25232] New: libc++ defines getline(istream, string) in <istream> instead of <string>
via llvm-bugs
llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
Sat Oct 17 21:48:26 PDT 2015
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25232
Bug ID: 25232
Summary: libc++ defines getline(istream, string) in <istream>
instead of <string>
Product: libc++
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: All Bugs
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: nicolasweber at gmx.de
CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org, mclow.lists at gmail.com
Classification: Unclassified
This doesn't link:
$ cat test.cc
#include <iosfwd>
#include <string>
std::string f(std::istream& is) {
std::string s;
std::getline(is, s);
return s;
}
$ clang++ -shared test.cc -o libfoo.so
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"std::__1::basic_istream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >&
std::__1::getline<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>, std::__1::allocator<char>
>(std::__1::basic_istream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >&,
std::__1::basic_string<char, std::__1::char_traits<char>,
std::__1::allocator<char> >&)", referenced from:
f(std::__1::basic_istream<char, std::__1::char_traits<char> >&) in
test-935a1a.o
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string/getline says that this
function should be in <string>. In libc++, it's declared in <string> but
defined in <istream>. If I add an `#include <istream>` to the file above, it
links fine.
Bug 10390 added the declarations to <string>, but it seems that the definition
should be there too?
(I kind of feel that I filed this before and that someone explained to me why
this things are arguably correct as they are now, but I can't find anything
like that.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20151018/c2f99b97/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list