[LLVMbugs] [Bug 23404] int32_t vs. int64_t vs. long ambiguity
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Mon May 4 02:36:55 PDT 2015
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23404
jonathan.sauer at gmx.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |jonathan.sauer at gmx.de
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from jonathan.sauer at gmx.de ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Is there a reason why a 64-bit 'long' value cannot unambiguously match
> std::int64_t?
When std::int64_t is defined as long long, the compiler cannot decide between
"foo(int)" and "foo(long long)". Use the macro INT64_C to create a constant of
type std::int64_t, e.g.
INT64_C(123)
I'm closing this report because I don't think it's a bug. Please feel free to
reopen if you disagree.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20150504/6da9e8fa/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list