[LLVMbugs] [Bug 24098] New: Wrong number of template arguments with empty parameter pack
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Sun Jul 12 09:49:04 PDT 2015
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24098
Bug ID: 24098
Summary: Wrong number of template arguments with empty
parameter pack
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++11
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: ldionne.2 at gmail.com
CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
The following code fails to compile on Clang trunk:
template <typename> struct f;
template <typename ...Dummy, typename = f<int, Dummy...>>
void foo() { }
The error is:
prog.cc:3:53: error: wrong number of template arguments (2, should be 1)
template <typename ...Dummy, typename = f<int, Dummy...>>
^
prog.cc:1:28: note: provided for 'template<class> struct f'
template <typename> struct f;
^
Strangely, the following compiles (swapped `Dummy...` and `int`):
template <typename> struct f;
template <typename ...Dummy, typename = f<Dummy..., int>>
void foo() { }
Live example: http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/yrtJAhiue1iDVLR3
Note that GCC rejects both examples. Naively, I think both should compile,
but I haven't checked the standard. In all cases, either Clang has a bug,
GCC has a bug or both have a bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20150712/93277920/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list