[LLVMbugs] [Bug 22650] New: std::deque cannot tolerate allocator exceptions

bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Fri Feb 20 13:19:32 PST 2015


http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22650

            Bug ID: 22650
           Summary: std::deque cannot tolerate allocator exceptions
           Product: libc++
           Version: 3.5
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P
         Component: All Bugs
          Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: tavianator at tavianator.com
                CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu, mclow.lists at gmail.com
    Classification: Unclassified

Created attachment 13919
  --> http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=13919&action=edit
Reproducer

In std::deque::{push,emplace}_{back,front}, if the allocator/operator new
throws std::bad_alloc, bad things happen:

$ clang++ -std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++ -lc++abi -DOPERATION=push_back
deque_bug.cpp && ./a.out
[2]    22243 segmentation fault (core dumped)  ./a.out
$ clang++ -std=c++11 -stdlib=libc++ -lc++abi -DOPERATION=push_front
deque_bug.cpp && ./a.out
*** Error in `./a.out': free(): invalid pointer: 0x00007f8bf263ccd8 ***
...

The problem seems to be at lines 2281 and 2429 of <deque> which do

    try
    {
        __buf.push_back(__alloc_traits::allocate(__a, __base::__block_size));
    }
    catch (...)
    {
        __alloc_traits::deallocate(__a, __buf.{front,back}(),
__base::__block_size);
        throw;
    }

This code seems wrong for a couple reasons:

- If allocate() throws, __buf.push_back() is never called, so
__buf.{front,back}() is bogus
- if __buf.push_back() throws, __buf.{front,back}() is *still* bogus

The following patch fixes my test case.  There are other cases that should
probably be fixed as well, everywhere "catch (...)" appears, but I couldn't
trigger them so I didn't try to fix them.  Actually, assuming the capacity of
__buf is set correctly, I imagine the try/catch blocks could be removed
entirely, but I didn't test that.

--- /usr/include/c++/v1/deque   2014-03-05 14:06:20.000000000 -0500
+++ deque       2015-02-20 16:15:06.500667124 -0500
@@ -2269,16 +2269,17 @@
         __split_buffer<pointer, typename __base::__pointer_allocator&>
             __buf(max<size_type>(2 * __base::__map_.capacity(), 1),
                   0, __base::__map_.__alloc());
+        pointer __block = __alloc_traits::allocate(__a, __base::__block_size);
 #ifndef _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS
         try
         {
 #endif  // _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS
-            __buf.push_back(__alloc_traits::allocate(__a,
__base::__block_size));
+            __buf.push_back(__block);
 #ifndef _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS
         }
         catch (...)
         {
-            __alloc_traits::deallocate(__a, __buf.front(),
__base::__block_size);
+            __alloc_traits::deallocate(__a, __block, __base::__block_size);
             throw;
         }
 #endif  // _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS
@@ -2417,16 +2418,17 @@
             __buf(max<size_type>(2* __base::__map_.capacity(), 1),
                   __base::__map_.size(),
                   __base::__map_.__alloc());
+        pointer __block = __alloc_traits::allocate(__a, __base::__block_size);
 #ifndef _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS
         try
         {
 #endif  // _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS
-            __buf.push_back(__alloc_traits::allocate(__a,
__base::__block_size));
+            __buf.push_back(__block);
 #ifndef _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS
         }
         catch (...)
         {
-            __alloc_traits::deallocate(__a, __buf.back(),
__base::__block_size);
+            __alloc_traits::deallocate(__a, __block, __base::__block_size);
             throw;
         }
 #endif  // _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20150220/7fcbea43/attachment.html>


More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list