[llvm-bugs] [Bug 24601] New: Should isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute handle copysign?

[via llvm-bugs]

https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24601

            Bug ID: 24601
           Summary: Should isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute handle copysign?
           Product: libraries
           Version: trunk
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P
         Component: Global Analyses
          Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: schnetter at gmail.com
                CC: llvm-bugs at lists.llvm.org
    Classification: Unclassified

I think that isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute in lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.ccp
should mark copysign as "true". Like fabs, copysign is "safe".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20150827/8c0fcaa8/attachment.html>