[LLVMbugs] [Bug 21504] New: should we forward our complex math to libm?

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21504

            Bug ID: 21504
           Summary: should we forward our complex math to libm?
           Product: libc++
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P
         Component: All Bugs
          Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: danalbert at google.com
                CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu, mclow.lists at gmail.com
    Classification: Unclassified

Is there any reason we're not delegating the math in <complex> to <complex.h>?
I don't believe any of us look at this code too closely (or very often), so
delegating to the lower library means we wouldn't have to worry about it any
more.

It looks like we don't have any tests for accuracy of these functions, whereas
the math libraries will be focused on that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20141106/dec8cad7/attachment.html>