[LLVMbugs] [Bug 16355] Missing -Wuninitialized warning in superclass initialization

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16355

Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |nlewycky at google.com
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #2 from Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> ---
Initial bug:
pr16355-1.cc:16:17: warning: field 'f_' is uninitialized when used here
      [-Wuninitialized]
  Sub() : Super(f_.x_) {}  // Should warn here
                ^
1 warning generated.

Richard's example:
pr16355.cc:3:13: warning: field 'b' is uninitialized when used here
      [-Wuninitialized]
  Foo() : a(b), b(0) {}
            ^
1 warning generated.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20140324/8143bdc7/attachment.html>