[LLVMbugs] [Bug 22039] New: clang accepts ambiguous function name lookup when using operator()
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Sat Dec 27 19:11:48 PST 2014
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22039
Bug ID: 22039
Summary: clang accepts ambiguous function name lookup when
using operator()
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: ryan.burn at gmail.com
CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
clang accepts this code:
#include <iostream>
struct A {
void operator()(int) {
std::cout << "A::f\n";
}
};
struct B {
void operator()() {
std::cout << "B::f\n";
}
};
struct C
: A, B
{
};
int main() {
C c;
c();
return 0;
}
which should give an ambiguous name lookup error. Both gcc and intel's compiler
correctly give the operator() is ambiguous error
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20141228/82d4135a/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list