[LLVMbugs] [Bug 21873] New: [fuzz] Assertion `0 && "Invalid SLocOffset or bad function choice"' failed.

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21873

            Bug ID: 21873
           Summary: [fuzz] Assertion `0 && "Invalid SLocOffset or bad
                    function choice"' failed.
           Product: clang
           Version: trunk
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P
         Component: -New Bugs
          Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: sami.liedes at iki.fi
                CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
    Classification: Unclassified

Created attachment 13514
  --> http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=13514&action=edit
test case

Fuzzing discovered that the attached test case, when given as input to

  clang -fno-crash-diagnostics -std=c++11 -xc++ -c -emit-llvm

causes this assertion failure:

clang-3.6: tools/clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp:817: clang::FileID
clang::SourceManager::getFileIDLoaded(unsigned int) const: Assertion `0 &&
"Invalid SLocOffset or bad function choice"' failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20141210/b7e6c9cf/attachment.html>