[LLVMbugs] [Bug 21841] New: [fuzz] Assertion `SS == getCurFunction()->SwitchStack.back() && "switch stack missing push/pop!"' failed.

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21841

            Bug ID: 21841
           Summary: [fuzz] Assertion `SS ==
                    getCurFunction()->SwitchStack.back() && "switch stack
                    missing push/pop!"' failed.
           Product: clang
           Version: trunk
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P
         Component: -New Bugs
          Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: sami.liedes at iki.fi
                CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
    Classification: Unclassified

Created attachment 13482
  --> http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=13482&action=edit
test case

Fuzzing discovered that the attached test case, when given as input to

  clang -fno-crash-diagnostics -std=c++11 -xc++ -c -emit-llvm

causes this assertion failure:

clang-3.6: tools/clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp:731: StmtResult
clang::Sema::ActOnFinishSwitchStmt(clang::SourceLocation, clang::Stmt *,
clang::Stmt *): Assertion `SS == getCurFunction()->SwitchStack.back() &&
"switch stack missing push/pop!"' failed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20141210/2e7d16d8/attachment.html>