[LLVMbugs] [Bug 19309] New: __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) should only be allowed at definitions
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Wed Apr 2 07:38:55 PDT 2014
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19309
Bug ID: 19309
Summary: __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) should only be
allowed at definitions
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: Frontend
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: timurrrr at google.com
CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
I believe __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) should only be allowed at
function/method definitions.
Consider a code like this:
--- x.h ---
class X {
void f();
__attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) void g();
};
-----------
-- x.cpp --
#include "x.h"
__attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) void X::f() {
...
}
void X::g() {
...
}
-----------
I've spent half a day analyzing a file like x.cpp before I looked at x.h.
I think we should disallow __attribute__((no_sanitize_address)) at declaraions
because:
- it's more consistent
- it's much more readable, there's no "implicit attribute applied somewhere
else" when looking at the code of a function/method.
- applying/removing the attribute would usually result in fewer recompilations
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20140402/1e609684/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list