[LLVMbugs] [Bug 17079] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting trunk and 3.3)
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Tue Sep 3 00:21:51 PDT 2013
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17079
Bug ID: 17079
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting trunk
and 3.3)
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: LLVM Codegen
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: su at cs.ucdavis.edu
CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
The following code is miscompiled by the current clang trunk and clang 3.3 on
x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
This is a regression from clang 3.2.
$ clang-trunk -v
clang version 3.4 (trunk 189735)
$ clang-trunk -O2 small.c
$ a.out
1
$ clang-trunk -O3 small.c
$ a.out
0
$ clang-3.3 -O3 small.c
$ a.out
0
$ clang-3.2 -O3 small.c
$ a.out
1
$
-------------------------------------------
int printf (const char *, ...);
int a = 0, e, f, g = 0, h, *j = &g, k, l, m, n;
volatile int b, d;
short c[2];
static void foo (int *p)
{
int i;
for (m = 0;; m = 0)
{
short *o = &c[1];
for (a = 2; a >= 0; a--)
{
int *t = &e;
b;
for (h = 0; h <= 1; h++)
if (c[0])
{
n = c[1];
*t = 0;
}
int q[3][8] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, l, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, f, l, e, e, k };
short *r = &c[1];
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
*r = 0;
b;
c[0] = 0;
*p = 1;
}
}
d;
*o = 1;
b;
if (*p)
break;
}
}
int
main ()
{
int *s = &g;
foo (s);
*j = c[1];
printf ("%d\n", g);
return 0;
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20130903/887d47e3/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list