[LLVMbugs] [Bug 17530] New: MC-COFF: multiple levels of linkonce_odr aliases produce an unlinkable COFF object
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Wed Oct 9 17:32:31 PDT 2013
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17530
Bug ID: 17530
Summary: MC-COFF: multiple levels of linkonce_odr aliases
produce an unlinkable COFF object
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: MC
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: rnk at google.com
CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu, peter at pcc.me.uk,
rafael.espindola at gmail.com, ruiu at google.com
Classification: Unclassified
$ cat t.ll
@my_alias = alias linkonce_odr void ()* @my_inline
@my_alias2 = alias linkonce_odr void ()* @my_alias
define linkonce_odr void @my_inline() {
ret void
}
define i32 @main() {
call void @my_alias2()
ret i32 0
}
$ llc t.ll -o tll.obj -filetype=obj && link tll.obj -defaultlib:libcmt.lib
-out:t.exe -nologo
tll.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _my_alias2
tll.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol _my_alias
$ dumpbin /symbols tll.obj
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
000 00000000 SECT1 notype Static | .text
Section length 8, #relocs 1, #linenums 0, checksum 0
002 00000000 SECT2 notype Static | .text$my_inline
Section length 1, #relocs 0, #linenums 0, checksum 0,
selection 2 (pick any)
004 00000001 ABS notype Static | @feat.00
005 00000000 SECT2 notype () External | _my_inline
006 00000000 SECT1 notype () External | _main
007 00000000 UNDEF notype WeakExternal | _my_alias2
Default index 9 library search
009 00000000 UNDEF notype WeakExternal | _my_alias
Default index 5 library search
The symbol at index 7 points to index 9 which points to index 5.
Rui says that these weak external aliases are more like fallbacks. The symbol
is still undefined, and if nobody provides a definition, then it is resolved to
the "default index". So, it looks like you can't do this twice. You can't
fallback to a fallback symbol.
I'm filing this as an MC bug, since any IR could hit this, but I'll probably
try to patch clang to avoid this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20131010/69703674/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list