[LLVMbugs] [Bug 17861] New: False positive "Function call argument is an uninitialized value" after assigning through another, equivalent struct pointer when using bitfields
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Fri Nov 8 20:11:54 PST 2013
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17861
Bug ID: 17861
Summary: False positive "Function call argument is an
uninitialized value" after assigning through another,
equivalent struct pointer when using bitfields
Product: clang
Version: 3.3
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: Static Analyzer
Assignee: kremenek at apple.com
Reporter: dougie.richardson at gmail.com
CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
Created attachment 11504
--> http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=11504&action=edit
Xcode project demonstrating problem
I have two structs, both packed and 12 bytes long. One struct uses bitfield and
the other does not. If I take a pointer to the first struct, and then pass it
to a function that in turn casts it to a pointer to the second struct and
initializes the values, the static analyzer reports the values are
uninitialized.
The attached Xcode project demonstrates the problem.
I was able to workaround the problem by creating a union that contains the two
structs and passing that around instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20131109/360c571b/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list