[LLVMbugs] [Bug 16588] New: Support unqualified btr, bts

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16588

            Bug ID: 16588
           Summary: Support unqualified btr, bts
           Product: libraries
           Version: trunk
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P
         Component: Backend: X86
          Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
          Reporter: artagnon at gmail.com
                CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
    Classification: Unclassified

I happened to notice that linux.git uses plenty of btr and bts
instructions (not btrl, btrw, btsl, btsw).  For examples, see
arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h.  LLVM barfs on these due to ambiguity,
while GNU as is fine with them.  Surely, there must be architectures
where the w/l variant is unavailable?  LLVM must support those
architectures, no?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20130710/e99098d3/attachment.html>