[LLVMbugs] [Bug 18316] New: [powerpc-darwin][AsmPrinter] addis instruction expects 0 instead of r0
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Mon Dec 23 21:33:04 PST 2013
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18316
Bug ID: 18316
Summary: [powerpc-darwin][AsmPrinter] addis instruction expects
0 instead of r0
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: Macintosh
OS: MacOS X
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: Backend: PowerPC
Assignee: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: fang at csl.cornell.edu
CC: hfinkel at anl.gov, iains-llvm at btconnect.com,
llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu, ulrich.weigand at de.ibm.com
Classification: Unclassified
During my stage-2 build of powerpc-darwin8 clang, stage-1 clang was found to
emit some assembly that was rejected by the system assembler (including the
'as' from odcctools-2009).
% cat addis.s
addis r30, 0, 1 ; OK
addis r30, r1, 1 ; OK
addis r30, r0, 1 : rejected
% as addis.s -o addis.o
addis.s:3:Parameter error: r0 not allowed for parameter 2 (code as 0 not r0)
Apparently, r0 is special enough to warrant different syntax in certain
contexts.
Would it be possible to emit such instructions differently?
The PPC darwin asm parser, accepts all of the above:
% ~/local/src/LLVM-svn/gcc40-cmake-build/bin/llvm-mc -triple
powerpc-apple-darwin8 addis.s -filetype=obj -o addis.o
I don't mind keeping that as-is, but if you want tighter conformity, you could
mimic the darwin assembler behavior.
I think it's more important to emit darwin-asm-friendly code so that
-no-integrated-as continues to work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20131224/532371d5/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list