[LLVMbugs] [Bug 18125] New: Repetition of template name of conversion operator in backtrace
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Tue Dec 3 09:27:44 PST 2013
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18125
Bug ID: 18125
Summary: Repetition of template name of conversion operator in
backtrace
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++
Assignee: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
Reporter: jonathan.sauer at gmx.de
CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
The following (incorrect) code results in a slightly confusing template
backtrace when being compiled with clang r196094:
struct Foo {
template <typename T>
operator T() const
{
T::bar();
}
};
template <typename T>
struct Vector {};
int main()
{
Vector<float> v = Foo();
}
This results in:
% ~/LLVM/build/Release+Asserts/bin/clang++ -c clang.cppclang.cpp:5:12: error:
no member named 'bar' in 'Vector<float>'
T::bar();
^
clang.cpp:14:25: note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'Foo::operator Vector<Vector<float> >'
requested here
Vector<float> v = Foo();
^
1 error generated.
For some reason, in the note/backtrace the operator is not called
'Foo::operator Vector<float>', but 'Foo::operator Vector<Vector<float> >', with
'Vector' being repeated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20131203/34907605/attachment.html>
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list