[LLVMbugs] [Bug 14026] New: With large tuple size(60) clang much slower than gcc
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Thu Oct 4 13:17:39 PDT 2012
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14026
Bug #: 14026
Summary: With large tuple size(60) clang much slower than gcc
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: C++11
AssignedTo: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
ReportedBy: cppljevans at gmail.com
CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
Created attachment 9308
--> http://llvm.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=9308
contains all files needed to run test, and test output (.txt) file.
Using 2 different implementations of tuple, at large tuple size (60),
the clang compiler is more than 3 times slower than gcc.
The benchmark was run with a python program, tuple_benchmark_run.py
in the attached zip file.
The timing output is in the *.time.txt file in the zip file.
The make was used to run the .py file, and the output of that
make command also incuded in the *.compilation file.
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list