[LLVMbugs] [Bug 14026] With large tuple size(60) clang much slower than gcc

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14026

Larry Evans <cppljevans at suddenlink.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #7 from Larry Evans <cppljevans at suddenlink.net> 2012-11-27 12:31:43 CST ---
Additional test code (tuple.benchmark.tree_builder.cpp from here:

http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/variadic_templates/sandbox/slim/test/tuple.benchmark.tree_builder.cpp

) shows clang does much worse than gcc at modest TUPLE_SIZE(15) and
TREE_DEPTH(7).

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.