[LLVMbugs] [Bug 13051] New: clang suggests that T::foo should maybe be T::for

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13051

             Bug #: 13051
           Summary: clang suggests that T::foo should maybe be T::for
           Product: clang
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: quality-of-implementation
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P
         Component: C++
        AssignedTo: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
        ReportedBy: richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
                CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu,
                    rikka at google.com
    Classification: Unclassified


template<typename T> struct S { }; void f() { f(S<int>::foo()); }

<stdin>:1:57: error: no member named 'foo' in 'S<int>'; did you mean 'for'?
template<typename T> struct S { }; void f() { f(S<int>::foo()); }
                                                ~~~~~~~~^

Umm... no.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.