[LLVMbugs] [Bug 13032] New: improve overload resolution diagnostic for overloaded function argument
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Tue Jun 5 14:22:42 PDT 2012
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13032
Bug #: 13032
Summary: improve overload resolution diagnostic for overloaded
function argument
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: quality-of-implementation
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: C++
AssignedTo: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
ReportedBy: richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
Consider this code:
#include <algorithm>
bool less(int, int);
bool less(const char*, const char*);
void f(int *arr, int size) {
std::sort(arr, arr+size, less);
}
We produce this diagnostic:
<stdin>:7:3: error: no matching function for call to 'sort'
std::sort(arr, arr+size, less);
^~~~~~~~~
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4/../../../../include/c++/4.4/bits/stl_algo.h:5243:5:
note: candidate template ignored: couldn't infer template argument
'_Compare'
sort(_RandomAccessIterator __first, _RandomAccessIterator __last,
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4/../../../../include/c++/4.4/bits/stl_algo.h:5207:5:
note: candidate function template not viable: requires 2 arguments, but 3
were provided
sort(_RandomAccessIterator __first, _RandomAccessIterator __last)
^
It would be great if we could instead produce a diagnostic explaining that none
of the 'sort' overloads allowed us to resolve the overloaded 'less' function:
<stdin>:7:3: error: reference to overloaded function could not be resolved
std::sort(arr, arr+size, less);
^~~~
<stdin>:4:6: note: possible function
bool less(const char*, const char*);
^
<stdin>:3:6: note: possible function
bool less(int, int);
^
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list