[LLVMbugs] [Bug 13484] New: Non-capturing lambas should be a constant expression
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Mon Jul 30 16:22:00 PDT 2012
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13484
Bug #: 13484
Summary: Non-capturing lambas should be a constant expression
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: C++11
AssignedTo: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
ReportedBy: pfultz2 at yahoo.com
CC: dgregor at apple.com, llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
Although the standard doesn't specify if lambda expressions are literal types,
gcc does allow it, and this could be useful for when you want to have a lambda
at class scope.
Here is an example code:
struct A
{
static constexpr auto F = [](){};
};
int main()
{
A::F();
return 0;
}
Clang produces this error:
error: constexpr variable 'F' must be initialized by a constant
expression
static constexpr auto F = [](){};
^~~~~~
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list