[LLVMbugs] [Bug 13365] valgrind error emitting template diagnostic

bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Sun Jul 15 18:16:35 PDT 2012


http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13365

Richard Smith <richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <richard-llvm at metafoo.co.uk> 2012-07-15 20:16:35 CDT ---
Fixed in r160245. It was this classic bug:

struct TemplateArgument { /* ... */ };
struct DeducedTemplateArgument : TemplateArgument { /* ... */ };

struct Sema::InstantiatingTemplate {
  InstantiatingTemplate(/*...*/ const TemplateArgument *Arg,
                        unsigned NumArgs /*...*/);
};

Sema::DeduceFoo(const SmallVectorImpl<DeducedTemplateArgument> &Deduced) {
  InstantiatingTemplate Inst(Deduced.data(), Deduced.size());
  // ...
}

I've switched InstantiatingTemplate over to ArrayRef to prevent recurrences of
this here. I wonder if we can implement a warning to catch this; specifically,
if we have:

  f(..., x.f1(), x.f2(), ...)

where 'x.f1()' undergoes an implicit derived-to-base conversion, and 'x.f2()'
is of integral type, ALARM BELLS. [Likewise for cases like "f(..., expr, expr +
k, ...)", if there's an implicit derived-to-base conversion for both
arguments].

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list