[LLVMbugs] [Bug 11597] New: Incorrect alignment warning about aligned struct members
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Fri Dec 16 06:36:56 PST 2011
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11597
Bug #: 11597
Summary: Incorrect alignment warning about aligned struct
members
Product: new-bugs
Version: trunk
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: new bugs
AssignedTo: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
ReportedBy: dimitry at andric.com
CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Classification: Unclassified
Using clang trunk r146734 (and also 3.0 release), I get unexpected
warnings when checking for alignment problems using -Wcast-align. I
reduced the problem case to the following:
struct foo {
} __attribute__((__aligned__(16)));
struct bar {
int m[128] __attribute__((__aligned__(16)));
};
void baz(struct bar *b)
{
struct foo *f = (struct foo *)&b->m;
}
Here, the bar::m member is declared to be 16-byte aligned, but clang
still warns about it, as shown:
$ clang -Wcast-align -c align2.c
align2.c:10:19: warning: cast from 'int (*)[128]' to 'struct foo *' increases
required alignment from 4 to 16 [-Wcast-align]
struct foo *f = (struct foo *)&b->m;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning generated.
If I interpret gcc's documentation on aligned attributes correctly, the
alignment is supposed to apply to the array base m here, not to each
individual member of the array. So in that case, the warning is
incorrect.
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list