[LLVMbugs] [Bug 9627] potentially bogus constructor errors
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Mon Apr 4 21:19:20 PDT 2011
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9627
Eli Friedman <sharparrow1 at yahoo.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |sharparrow1 at yahoo.com
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Eli Friedman <sharparrow1 at yahoo.com> 2011-04-04 23:19:20 CDT ---
This essentially reduces to the following:
template <class T> class Array1D {
Array1D(int n, T *a);
};
template<typename T>
struct A {
Array1D<int> x;
A() : x(1, (const int*)0) {}
};
The code is invalid, but no diagnostic is required if the class isn't
instantiated. clang is being more aggressive about diagnosing the issue than
gcc.
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list