[LLVMbugs] [Bug 7185] New: template evaluated to early
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org
Fri May 21 02:55:33 PDT 2010
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=7185
Summary: template evaluated to early
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++
AssignedTo: unassignedclangbugs at nondot.org
ReportedBy: niebuhr at niebuhrt.de
CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu, dgregor at apple.com
I am not sure if this is a bug.
Given the code below, clang states that the function hash is not know. But
doesn't the C++ standard say, that template expressions are only evaluated
where they are used?
And since the functions are defined below, the compiler shouldn't complain.
Remark: This code snippet is from the pocolib project.
template <class T>
struct Hash
/// A generic hash function.
{
std::size_t operator () (T value) const
/// Returns the hash for the given value.
{
return hash(value);
}
};
std::size_t Foundation_API hash(Int8 n);
std::size_t Foundation_API hash(UInt8 n);
std::size_t Foundation_API hash(Int16 n);
std::size_t Foundation_API hash(UInt16 n);
std::size_t Foundation_API hash(Int32 n);
std::size_t Foundation_API hash(UInt32 n);
std::size_t Foundation_API hash(Int64 n);
std::size_t Foundation_API hash(UInt64 n);
std::size_t Foundation_API hash(const std::string& str);
.....
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list