[LLVMbugs] [Bug 6414] Nondeterministic invalid optimization in llvm-ld

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6414

Sterling Stuart Stein <stein at ir.iit.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |

--- Comment #5 from Sterling Stuart Stein <stein at ir.iit.edu> 2010-02-25 02:10:29 CST ---
Sorry, I thought I attached it.
Now, the 3 BitCode files should be attached.

Sorry, my description was misleading.
I just tried to make a quick translation
into a C-like language for legibility.
Yes, g is a separate function, so it
doesn't have to be in f in any sense.
(The net effect of this is that
it has internal linkage instead of external.)
In the BitCode, you can see that g is in fact
a plain function, and f is just return g.
So, this by itself shouldn't be a problem.
Now that you can see it, is it valid BitCode?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.