[LLVMbugs] [Bug 6359] Clang rejects out-of-line destructors for classes which are typedef'ed to themselves

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6359

Johannes Schaub <schaub-johannes at web.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |schaub-johannes at web.de

--- Comment #2 from Johannes Schaub <schaub-johannes at web.de> 2010-02-21 11:15:07 CST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I committed a temporary workaround from dgregor as r96733. Leaving bug open
> until we resolve exactly how function name and class name conflicts here should
> be handled.
> 
> I'm a bit concerned by whether this one is well-formed. After reading
> [dcl.typedef] p2 and p4, it seems like even this code is bad:
> 
> struct S { };
> typedef struct S S; // OK
> typedef struct S S; // error due to typedef-name in elaborated type specifier?
> 
> Does p4 completely strip the usefulness of p2? I hope I'm missing something. =D

I think your interpretation is correct. See
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#407 .

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.