[LLVMbugs] [Bug 6359] Clang rejects out-of-line destructors for classes which are typedef'ed to themselves

[bugzilla-daemon at llvm.org]

http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6359

--- Comment #1 from Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> 2010-02-21 04:24:52 CST ---
I committed a temporary workaround from dgregor as r96733. Leaving bug open
until we resolve exactly how function name and class name conflicts here should
be handled.

I'm a bit concerned by whether this one is well-formed. After reading
[dcl.typedef] p2 and p4, it seems like even this code is bad:

struct S { };
typedef struct S S; // OK
typedef struct S S; // error due to typedef-name in elaborated type specifier?

Does p4 completely strip the usefulness of p2? I hope I'm missing something. =D

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.