[LLVMbugs] [Bug 2304] New: CHECKER: false positive on uninitialized warning
bugzilla-daemon at cs.uiuc.edu
bugzilla-daemon at cs.uiuc.edu
Sat May 10 01:39:07 PDT 2008
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2304
Summary: CHECKER: false positive on uninitialized warning
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Semantic Analyzer
AssignedTo: unassignedbugs at nondot.org
ReportedBy: edwintorok at gmail.com
CC: llvmbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
Using SVN r4294967285:
$ ~/llvm-svn/llvm/tools/clang/utils/ccc-analyzer xtest.c -c
xtest.c
ANALYZE: xtest.c foo
xtest.c:10:2: warning: [CHECKER] Branch condition evaluates to an uninitialized
value.
if(pt->partno == 1 || !found) {
^ ~~~~~~
ANALYZE: xtest.c bar
1 diagnostic generated.
$ cat xtest.c
struct x {
int partno;
};
int foo(struct x *pt)
{
int found;
if(pt->partno != 1) {
found = 0;
}
if(pt->partno == 1 || !found) {
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
int bar(int partno)
{
int found;
if(partno != 1) {
found = 0;
}
if(partno == 1 || !found) {
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
The HTML output produced says that the branch if(pt->partno...) is untaken.
Notice that if I use a struct it gives a warning, if I don't use the struct it
doesn't give a warning. found is not used uninitialized, because when
partno is 1 the !found condition is not evaluated anymore.
Also if partno was 1 on the first if, it still is that on the 2nd one.
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the llvm-bugs
mailing list