[LLVMbugs] Type naming clarification

Reid Spencer reid at x10sys.com
Wed May 31 08:39:44 PDT 2006


Looks good!

Reid.

On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 19:34 +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 May 2006 19:24, Reid Spencer wrote:
> > That comment is not 100% accurate :)
> >
> > While it is true that Type's don't inherently have names outside of the
> > SymbolTable, there are facilities at the Module level to deal with type
> > names. Please review the following Module functions:
> 
> Right, thanks for pointing out. How about the attached?
> 
> Thanks,
> Volodya
> _______________________________________________
> LLVMbugs mailing list
> LLVMbugs at cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-bugs/attachments/20060531/9947da70/attachment.sig>


More information about the llvm-bugs mailing list