[lldb-dev] RFC: siginfo reading/writing support

[Michał Górny via lldb-dev]

On Wed, 2022-01-12 at 13:28 +0100, Pavel Labath wrote:
> 
> This wouldn't solve the problem of writing to the siginfo struct, but I 
> am not sure if this is a use case Michał is actually trying to solve 
> right now (?) If it is then, maybe this could be done through a separate 
> command, as we currently lack the ability to resume a process/thread 
> with a specific signal ("process signal" does something slightly 
> different). It could either be brand new command, or integrated into the 
> existing process/thread continue commands. (thread continue --signal 
> SIGFOO => "continue with SIGFOO"; thread continue --siginfo $47 => 
> continue with siginfo in $47 ???)

Yeah, writing is not very important to me right now.  I think it's
rather uncommon for people to override siginfo.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny