[lldb-dev] SB API questions

Raphael “Teemperor” Isemann via lldb-dev lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org
Sun May 30 04:09:23 PDT 2021

Thanks! In the spirit of not letting users fix our bugs, I just made a draft patch for the logging enable/disable: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103376

I don't think landing code is much of a burden, but I think you can just re-request commit access if you had it before.

- Raphael

> On 30 May 2021, at 12:52, Bruce Mitchener <bruce.mitchener at gmail.com> wrote:
> \On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 10:57 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com <mailto:teemperor at gmail.com>> wrote:
> And I think the best way to propose a new API is maybe just making a
> dummy patch that adds the API + documentation (doesn't need an actual
> implementation or tests). And if everyone agrees the new API is fine
> you can add the tests and implementation. By making a patch you also
> automatically get everyone subscribed to your patch via Herald rules
> or people reading the mailing list.
> If you don't want to make patches, I think bug reports on
> bugs.llvm.org <http://bugs.llvm.org/> could also work. Most of the thing you describe sound
> like they don't need a lot of effort to implement/test, so there's a
> good chance someone will implement it for you.
> I've just created https://reviews.llvm.org/D103375 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103375> for one of the pieces. I used to have commit access, but the last time I used it was before the move to GitHub, so I don't mind doing the work and landing things myself ... I don't want to create much of a burden on others!
> Thanks for your feedback!
>  - Bruce

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20210530/3a39927a/attachment.html>

More information about the lldb-dev mailing list