[lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] HTTP library in LLVM

[Eric Christopher via lldb-dev]

+LLDB Dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> as well for visibility. +Pavel Labath
<labath at google.com> since he and I have talked about such things.

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 7:26 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:

> [+debug info folks, just as FYI - since the immediate question's more
> about 3rd party library deps than the nuances of DWARF, etc]
>
> I'd imagine avoiding writing such a thing from scratch would be desirable,
> but that the decision might depend somewhat on what libraries out there
> you/we would consider including, what their licenses and further
> dependencies are.
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:22 PM Petr Hosek via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> We're considering implementing [debuginfod](
>> https://sourceware.org/elfutils/Debuginfod.html) library in LLVM.
>> Initially, we'd like to start with the client implementation, which would
>> enable debuginfod support in tools like llvm-symbolizer, but later we'd
>> also like to provide LLVM-based debuginfod server implementation.
>>
>> debuginfod uses HTTP and so we need an HTTP library, ideally one that
>> supports both client and server.
>>
>> The question is, would it be acceptable to use an existing C++ HTTP
>> library or would it be preferred to implement an HTTP library in LLVM from
>> scratch?
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/attachments/20200831/74682a1c/attachment.html>